SEATTLE.GOV City Services Staff Directory About Seattle City Contacts
 SEARCH: 

1999 Seattle Election Information

Home
Filings
Campaigns
Total
Contributions

Total
Expenditures

Contributor
Search

Lists of
Contributors

Employers of
Contributors

Contributors
by Type

Contrib. by
Neighborhood

Contrib. by
Size

Expenditures
by Type

Indep. Expend.
& Spec. Repts.

Historical
Comparisons

Primary Election
Voters' Guide

General Election
Voters' Guide
Compliance
Rates

Filer
Assistance

General Election Voters' Guide
Prop 13 - Initiative Process & Time Limits

General
Election
Voters'
Guide
Introduction
 
Links to
Non-Seattle
Voters'
Pamphlets
Links
 
Video
Voters'
Guide

View OnLine!

Broadcast
Schedule

 
Council
Position 1
Chow
Nicastro
 
Council
Position 3
Jones
Steinbrueck
 
Council
Position 5
Firestone
Pageler
 
Council
Position 7
Chong
Wills
 
Council
Position 9
Compton
Mason
 
Prop 1
Seattle Ctr
Comm Ctr
Levy

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 2
Gender
Neutral
Language

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 3
Obsolete
Descriptions
Departments
& Positions

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 4
Obsolete
Comptroller
& Treasurer
References

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 5
Annual
Budget
Estimates

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 6
Eliminate
Auditing
Committee
References

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 7
Claims &
Lawsuits

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 8
Obsolete
City
Election
Provisions

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 9
Civil
Service
Commission

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 10
Police
Chief
Examination

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 11
Fire
Chief
Experience
Requirement

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 12
Mayor's
Favorable
Action
on Bills

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 13
Initiative
Process &
Time Limits

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal

Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 14
Oaths of
Office

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
Prop 15
Drafting of
Ordinance
Amendments

Statement
For and
Rebuttal


Statement
Against and
Rebuttal


Title &
Explanation


Complete Text

 
 
  Statement Against
 
  Proposition 13 would amend and delete various items, gender words, such as he, she, him, her, "Comptroller", and "Treasurer" throughout the City Charter. For reasons not to delete these, please see statements against Propositions 1, 2 and 4.

The city council is nit picking the city charter to make in consequential changes but when it comes to an issue as important as following their own city charter initiative laws, they have failed to comply. An example of this is the "Back to Basics" Initiative 45 that was certified and presented to the city council August 24, 1998. When the city council failed to act on I-45 within forty-five days from the date it was introduced to them, the city charter mandates that it must go before the voters at the next regularly scheduled election, which would be November 2, 1999. This has not been done. A lawsuit was filed (No. 99-2-21036-1 SEA) in King County Superior Court on September 10, 1999 against the Seattle City Council for failing to comply with their own city charter initiative laws.

The Seattle City Charter is very clear on initiative requirements. Page C-9 section C mandates "… if the City Council…shall during forty-five (45) days after receipt thereof have failed to take final action thereon…[the initiative] shall be taken in charge by the city comptroller and the city council shall order the measure submitted to the qualified electors for approval or rejection at the next regularly scheduled election".

Under Article IV Legislative Department Section 1B Initiative and Referendum; how exercised: "Completion of petition, consideration in council": "The first power of reserved by the people is the initiative. It may be exercised on petition of a number of registered voters equal to not less than ten (10) percent of the total number of votes cast for the office of mayor at the last preceding municipal elections, proposing and asking for the enactment as an ordinance of a bill or measure, the full text of which shall be included in the petition…".

Article IV Section 1 provides "…the power to propose for themselves any ordinance dealing with any matter within realm of local affairs or municipal business and to enact or reject the same at the polls, independent of the mayor and city council, is also reserved by the people of Seattle".

The city council must comply with their city charter initiative laws regardless of whether they agree or disagree with an initiative such as I-45. The initiative is the first power of the people and is matter of great importance. Changing terms such as he, she is not.

Vote No on Proposition 13 on November 2, 1999.

 
  Statement prepared by:
 
  Fred Bucke
Linda Jordan

Phone: (206) 523-6066

 
  Rebuttal to Statement Against
 
  The statement opposing Proposition 13 has nothing to do with the proposal. Proposition 13 would clarify the time periods under which proposers of initiatives can gather signatures. It resolves an ambiguity in the current Charter in a way that is most favorable to those proposing initiatives by making clear that an extra 20 days is allowed if some of the initial signatures submitted on an initiative petition are found to be invalid. The Proposition also updates the Charter to recognize that signatures are to be submitted to the City Clerk and that the County is responsible for verifying signatures.

These changes are not "inconsequential", as the opponents claim. Rather, they make the initiative process clearer and provide more time for signature gathering in some cases. They enhance the initiative process, not hinder it. Vote YES on Proposition 13.

 
  Rebuttal prepared by:
 
  Paul Schell, Mayor, City of Seattle
Sue Donaldson, President, Seattle City Council
 
 
 
 
SEEC Home Page