Proposition 1 has got it all backwards. Most
money will go toward a downtown Taj Mahal library that will
cost too much and serve too few.
This proposal will spend 2/3 of all its money on the
downtown library and only 1/3 on neighborhood libraries. (Source:
Libraries for All, pg. 10) Yet neighborhood libraries are used
far more than the downtown library!
Example:
1997 Downtown library Neighborhood Libraries
# of children's events 70 2,467
# of participants 2,674 61,166
(Source: Libraries for All Capital Plan March 1998 pg. 13)
Proposition 1 proposes to demolish and build a
new downtown library on the same site, a la Kingdome style!
"Has the library board ever heard of the
word remodeling?...We can probably save $50 million dollars or
more by keeping our existing library. Let us stop this thoughtless
destruction."
(George Hartman, architect, designer of the Suzzallo Library
addition)
Libraries for all?
This proposal leaves over 16
neighborhoods, Georgetown, Southpark, Eastlake and others, without branch
libraries.
This property tax increases
housing costs.
Seattleites can look forward to the death of
Mayor Schell's affordable housing dreams if Proposition 1 passes.
It will adversely affect all renters, homeowners, and property
owners.
The total cost of Proposition 1, including interest at 6
1/4%, will be $347.9 million dollars! (Source: Tom Tierney,
Seattle City Official, July 29, 1998) The owner of a home valued at
$180,000 will pay, over the life of the bond, $1,370.00.
(Source: Friends of the Seattle Public Library Newsletter, May 1998)
If Seattle is to remain an affordable place to live,
basic services,like libraries, should be funded with
nonproperty tax resources like councilmanic
bonds.
The City used councilmanic bonds to construct
Benaroya Symphony Hall, Pacific Place/Nordstrom parking garage and
to purchase Key Tower. There are plans to spend $68 million in
councilmanic bonds on a new City Hall. (Source: City Financing
Model July 14, 1998) However, we believe library renovations should
benefit from that funding source first. Based on a citizen's
initiative the council will be placing a proposal to fund library
renovations with councilmanic bonds on a future ballot.
Until then, voting NO on Proposition 1 will help keep housing in Seattle
affordable.
Coffee?
Contrary to what some proponents argue, property
taxes amount to more than the cost of your "daily grind". All totaled
they are a serious responsibility requiring a daily grind of hard work
to pay off.
Submitted by the:
"NO" on Seattle Proposition 1 Committee
7860 Lake City Way NE
Seattle WA 98115
ph 523-6066
Jay Sauceda, Fred Bucke, Linda Jordan, Bob Hegamin
PROPOSITION 1 IS OUR PLAN
Citizens volunteered thousands of hours to help write the Libraries for
All plan. In contrast, opponents did not hold a single public meeting.
PROPOSITION 1 SERVES ALL NEIGHBORHOODS
Proposition 1 will renovate, replace or expand 22 branch libraries
and build 3 new ones served by a strong downtown "hub."
PROPOSITION 1 IS A RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT
The opponents would force library costs to compete with basic
needs such as fire, police and housing. Proposition 1 requires only 2% of
our property taxes - it's a sound investment.
PROPOSITION 1 LONG OVERDUE
We have not made a substantial investment in our libraries in more
than 40 years. We can no longer afford patchwork repairs to maintain
aging, overcrowded libraries - and we should not deny our children the
modern libraries they will need tomorrow.
Let's Create a Legacy We Can ALL be Proud Of!
Vote Yes for Proposition 1.
Argument for Seattle Proposition 1 - Submitted by:
Campaign Co-Chairs-
Ken Alhadeff
Dorothy Bullitt
Ron Chew
Sally Chong
Hubert Locke
Neighbors for Libraries
P.O. Box 19535
Seattle WA 98109
Phone 206-624-6156
FAX 206-652-1980
Email: prolibraries@seanet.com